Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M. Rubini , S. Moscatelli , F. Prati
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, University of Oxford School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Language and Social Psychology
ISSN 0261-927X
E-ISSN 1552-6526
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0261927x19864686
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 28db5869fc86765d521bc656634fefb1

Resumo

This research examined whether linguistic abstraction in group-directed criticisms moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect. Study 1 ( N = 76) showed that criticisms coming from an out-group member and formulated in concrete terms—which imply lower generalizability and stability of the information transmitted—provoked less negative reactions compared with out-group criticisms formulated in abstract terms. Linguistic abstraction did not affect reactions to in-group criticism. In Study 2 ( N = 77), receivers of concrete criticism from an out-group representative attributed less hostile intentions and prejudice to the critic, and this mediated the impact of critic group membership and linguistic abstraction on negativity toward criticism. Participants also reported more favorable attitudes toward the out-group as a whole when out-group criticism was formulated in concrete terms. This research underlines that linguistic abstraction can facilitate or obstruct effective group communication, and has important implications for the development of communicative strategies aiming to promote social change.

Ferramentas