Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) MICHAEL J. CODY , MARGARETL. McLAUGHLIN , Valerie Manusov , Risa E. Dickon
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of California, University of Washington, California State University, San Bernadino
ANO 1996
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Language and Social Psychology
ISSN 0261-927X
E-ISSN 1552-6526
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0261927x960151002
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 4068db2afa43adb0bd360fddc4d215ac

Resumo

This article compares respondents' beliefs about others' private and public explanations for failure to fulfill two compliance-gaining goals: providing assistance and accepting advice. Participants generated open-ended responses that were either acceptable accounts (public explanations) or probable causes (private attributions) for another's noncompliance. Data analysis showed that attributions and accounts tend to vary in form, and, as expected, public explanations perceived as likely to be communicated were more unintentional, uncontrollable, unstable, and external than were private explanations for both failure types. People's reports for both attributions and accounts, however, were influenced by the nature of the compliance goal, with means for scenarios depicting failures to take advice consistently more intentional and controllable than the responses for failing to provide assistance.

Ferramentas