Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Majority jury verdicts in England and Wales

A Vestige of White Supremacy

Bibliographic Data

ID2357789
AuthorsNisha Waller (0000-0003-4948-4432), Naima Sakande
Year2024
Volume65
Issue4
Pages26-52
Publication date2024-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRace & Class (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-3968 • E-ISSN: 1741-3125
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/03063968231212992
OpenAlexW4391134149
LanguageEN
References cited22

In England and Wales, the requirement for a unanimous jury verdict in criminal cases was abolished in 1967, marking a significant departure from a centuries-old legal tradition. Majority verdicts are now common practice, yet no research to date explores the origins of this sudden change to the jury system. In contrast, recent research in the US uncovered a connection between the conception of majority verdicts in Louisiana and Jim Crow era law-making, finding that majority verdicts were strategically introduced to suppress the black juror vote and facilitate quicker convictions to fuel free prison labour. The US Supreme Court later outlawed majority verdicts in a case known as Ramos v. Louisiana, amid recognition of their racist origins . Adopting the critical epistemological position guiding the US research, we consider how race and class underpinned the decision to introduce majority verdicts in England and Wales. Drawing on Home Office files and other archival materials, we find that an increase in eligible jurors from different racial and class backgrounds led to a perceived decline in the 'calibre' of jurors - reflective of wider public anxieties about Commonwealth immigration, Black Power and white disenfranchisement. We conclude that a desire to dilute the influence of 'coloured' migrants on juries contributed to the introduction of majority verdicts in England and Wales

Biology · Criminology · Genealogy · Jury · Political science · Racism · Sociology · White (mutation · White supremacy · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · History · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law

  • Inside the Jury

    Reid Hastie, Steven D Penrod et al.•Inside the Jury•1983

  • Policing the Crisis

    Open Access•Stuart Hall, Chas Critcher et al.•Policing the Crisis•1978

  • Black Power on the Telly

    Open Access•R Waters•Journal of British Studies•2015

  • Reports Of Committees

    Open Access•W R Cornish•Modern Law Review•1965

  • On racial diversity and group decision making

    Samuel R Sommer, Samuel R Sommers•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • The Effects of Ethnicity, SES, and Crime Status on Juror Decision Making

    Open Access•Cynthia Willis Esqueda, Russ K E Espinoza et al.•Hispanic Journal of Behavioral…•2008

  • Mapping the Racial Bias of the White Male Capital Juror

    Open Access•Mona Lynch, Charlotte Haney et al.•Law & Society Review•2011

  • British Black Power

    Open Access•J Narayan•The Sociological Review•2019

  • In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts

    Open Access•Peter J Coughlan•American Political Science Review•2000

  • The Conservative government and the 1961 Commonwealth Immigration Act

    Open Access•Dennis Dean•Race & Class•1993

  • From resistance to rebellion

    Open Access•A Sivanandan•Race & Class•1981

  • Address by the Home Secretary to the Institute

    Open Access•Roy Jenkins•Race•1967

  • Accepting the 'D' word

    Open Access•Matthew Vaughan•Race & Class•2019

  • When Black was a political colour

    Open Access•Jenny Bourne•Race & Class•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae