Conclusion
The Myth of Modernity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23588692 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jason Ā Josephson-Storm (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Myth of Disenchantment (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7208/chicago/9780226403533.003.0012 |
| OpenAlex | W4248820378 |
| ISBN | 9780226403533 |
| Language | EN |
The conclusion spells out the implications of the work as a whole. It addresses three Foucauldian doubts about the myth of disenchantment or “modernity paradigm” that have been animating this work as a whole: the historical doubt (is the disenchantment of the world truly an established historical pattern?), the critical-historical doubt (how, in the face of vibrant spiritualist and magical movements, did European societies come to think of themselves as disenchanted?), and the politico-theoretical doubt (have the workings of domination in Euro-American societies really belonged primarily to the mode of disenchantment?). This chapter devotes a section to addressing each of these doubts, and in so doing tie together some of the threads that have been woven throughout this book.
Aesthetics · Art · Disenchantment · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Literature · Modernity · Mythology · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Religion and Society Interactions
| Highly cited | No |
|---|