Genetic Interventions and The Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23614829 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julian Savulescu (0000-0003-1691-6403, University of Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Bonnie Steinbock |
| Year | 2009 |
| Publication date | 2009-02-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Oxford handbook of bioethics (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199562411.003.0023 |
| OpenAlex | W2554584235 |
| ISBN | 9780199562411 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 1 |
There has been considerable recent debate on the ethics of human enhancement. A number of prominent authors have been concerned about or critical of the use of technology to alter or enhance human beings, citing threats to human nature and dignity as one basis for these concerns. Frances Kamm has given a detailed rebuttal of Sandel's arguments, arguing that human enhancement is permissible. Nicholas Agar, in his book Liberal Eugenics , argues that enhancement should be permissible but not obligatory. He argues that what distinguishes liberal eugenics from the objectionable eugenic practices of the Nazis is that it is not based on a single conception of a desirable genome and that it is voluntary and not obligatory. This article takes a more provocative position. It aims to argue that, far from its being merely permissible, we have a moral obligation or moral reason to enhance ourselves and our children. Indeed, we have the same kind of obligation as we have to treat and prevent disease. It begins by considering the current interests in and possibilities of enhancement. It then offers three arguments that we have very strong reasons to seek to enhance.
Bioethics · Dignity · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Eugenics · Human enhancement · Law and economics · Moral obligation · Obligation · Political science · Rebuttal · Sociology · Transhumanism · Utilitarianism · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Objectivity and human bioenhancement. The paradox of the natural
Genetically engineering future generations’ compressed morbidity
Enhancing the Species
(Bio-/Cyber-/Robo-)technologically Enhanced and Designed “People” in the Most Recent Croatian Dystopian Prose
Modificar o no modificar el genoma de nuestra descendencia? Algunos comentarios a raíz de la Declaración del Comité de Bioética de España sobre la edición genómica en humanos
Interrogantes y retos actuales de la edición genética
Is human enhancement intrinsically bad
Experimental philosophy of medicine and the concepts of health and disease
La biología sintética y el imperativo de mejoramiento
Queerin’ the PGD Clinic
The myth of the moral enhancement
The better human, the better than human
The case of transhumanism
A Not‐So‐New Eugenics
Double effects of the pandemic (corona)
Knowledge kills action – why principles should play a limited role in policy-making
Love and Enhancement Technology
Back to Basics
The moral psychology of value sensitive design
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,27 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2022 (12) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |