Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) C.L. Ridgeway , C.L. Munsch , J.C. Williams
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA, Hastings College of the Law, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
ANO 2014
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Work and Occupations
ISSN 0730-8884
E-ISSN 1552-8464
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0730888413515894
CITAÇÕES 33
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 7909672261d78d059534739691798078

Resumo

Workers who request flexibility are routinely stigmatized. The authors experimentally tested and confirmed the hypothesis that individuals believe others view flexworkers less positively than they do. This suggests flexibility bias stems, in part, from pluralistic ignorance. The authors also found that flexplace requesters were stigmatized significantly more than flextime requesters. Given this finding, they recommend research distinguish between different types of flexwork. In a second study, they assessed whether exposure to information suggesting organizational leaders engage in flexible work reduced bias. They found that when the majority of high-status employees work flexibly, bias against flextime (but not flexplace) workers was attenuated.

Ferramentas