Electoral Systems in Context
Japan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23623375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kuniaki Nemoto (0000-0002-3117-2775, Musashi University, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Erik S Herron (0000-0002-6263-6464), Robert J Pekkanen (0000-0002-4634-0954), Matthew S Shugart |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 824-850 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-26 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.013.36 |
| OpenAlex | W2738536423 |
| ISBN | 9780190258658 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The system used for Japan’s House of Representatives (Shugiin, or HoR) was changed in the mid-1990s from hyperpersonalistic single nontransferable voting (SNTV) to mixed-member majoritarian (MMM). The reform was expected to bring about a move toward two-party competition, party-centered campaigning, and party centralization. Evidence generally supports the theoretically expected consequences of the electoral reform. However, the electoral system change did not completely transform Japanese party politics as expected. Some of the institutions and practices considered peculiar to the old electoral system, such as personal support networks and factions, were not wiped away by the reform. Other rules in the new system initially considered minor, such as dual candidacy, can have a substantive impact on incumbency advantage and Duvergerian convergence. These suggest that Japan’s electoral reform opens the way for new comparative research on the effects of electoral systems.
Candidacy · Competition (biology) · Context (archaeology) · Convergence (economics) · Democracy · Dual (grammatical number) · Economic growth · Economic system · Economics · Electoral reform · Electoral system · Geography · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Single non-transferable vote · Voting · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |