Centralization and powerlessness
India's democracy in a comparative perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23625907 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Atul Kohli (Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Pages | 89-107 |
| Publication date | 1994-08-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | State Power and Social Forces (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9781139174268.007 |
| OpenAlex | W2504068150 |
| ISBN | 9781139174268 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
During the 1970s and 1980s, a recurring pattern characterized political change in India: Control over governmental decisions tended to centralize in leaders who ruled by virtue of personal popularity, but who found it difficult to transform their personal power into a problem-solving political resource. A number of political consequences typically followed. Governmental legitimacy became hard to sustain; there was a high leadership turnover below the highest ranks; the state continued to perform at a low level of efficacy – in terms both of accommodating conflicting interests and of solving developmental problems; and political violence as well as poverty continued to dominate the political landscape. This chapter attempts to explain the roots of the simultaneous tendencies toward centralization and powerlessness in India's low-income democracy. It is argued that such tendencies toward centralization and powerlessness are generated by the near absence of systematic authority links between the state's apex and the vast social periphery. In years past, especially during the 1950s, India's nationalist party, the Congress, forged patronage links with regional and local influentials, thus creating a chain of authority that stretched from the capital city to villages. Over the last two decades or so, these links in the authority structure eroded, owing to a number of forces: The spread of democratic politics undermined the influence of regional and local traditional elites; and the nationalist party-qua-organization was destroyed by intra-elite conflict and by the recalcitrance of power-hungry national leaders.
Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Legitimacy · Perspective (graphical) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Poverty · Power (physics) · Sociology · State (computer science) · Virtue · Law · South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Bound to Rule
Between state and society
Democratic Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction
The Limits of Local Democracy
The Politics of Property Rights Institutions in Africa
From existential to minimum deterrence
Federal Policy in Local Context
The spatiality of social relations
Elected Leaders, Community and Development
Federalism in India during the Nehru and Post-Nehru Periods
Understanding 'political stability
Food security, governance and rural development under the BJP
Political Development, Revisited
Balancing Priorities, Aligning Interests
Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities
The social and spatial character of the Indian State
Fragile states
Asian Industrialization in Latin American Perspective
Territorial Democracy
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,68 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2014 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |