Who Killed Robin Hood?

Popular culture’ continues to be an elusive quarry. Though the term is widelycurrent in cultural studies and literary criticism, and indeed also in common speech, it has had a chequered career among historians since Peter Burke’s Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe (1978) made it for a time both fashionable and highly controversial. Between the fifteenth and the eighteenth centuries, Burke argued, many games, calendar rituals and other popular customs and beliefs were discountenanced by church and state authorities and measures taken to suppress or reform them. At the same time, there was a growing divergence between the outlook and values of elite groups (nobles, gentlemen and some middle-class elements in town and country) and those of the mass of the people. The former first distanced themselves from, then became increasingly hostile towards, elements of popular culture which they had formerly patronised. This notion of a ‘reform of popular culture’ was paralleled in the work of Keith Wrightson, who argued that whereas ‘in the middle of the reign of Elizabeth, English villagers had largely shared a common fund of traditional beliefs, values and standards of behaviour’, a century later ‘that common heritage had become the property of those “rusticall”, “rude,” “silly ignorants” who remained wedded to their superstitions and their disorders’.1

Art · History · Philippine History and Culture

• Lisibilité de l’histoire et (in)visibilité des corps violentés dans Sir Thomas More

  Open Access•Nicolas Thibault•Sillages critiques•2021

  Add to list