Differences That Might Matter? A Manifesto Diffractively Read
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23633481 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geert Thyssen (Liverpool John Moores University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 49-55 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Punctum Books (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.21983/p3.0193.1.07 |
| OpenAlex | W2900432412 |
| ISBN | 9781947447387 |
| Language | EN |
To write a manifesto is to expose oneself — to make oneself vulnerable to critique. In the case of a co-authored piece, it is also to show oneself to one’s co-writers (colleagues and perhaps friends). Yet, such vulnerability, which is moreover a vulner-ability to one’s self, forces one to take a close look in the mir-ror, and this includes those who are invited to deliver a reply as well. I find myself in that fortunate position. It is indeed with much gratitude to, and respect for, Naomi, Joris, and Piotr (and with equal humility) that I offer the following thoughts on their “Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy.” Hastily assembled as they were “then,” and clumsily put on paper as they are “now” to reflect the spirit of the actual reply, they are theirs and the reader’s to further critique.
Business · Financial system · Manifesto · Political science · Accounting · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Law · Religious Education and Schools
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |