Animals in Religion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23639284 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen R L Clark (0000-0001-9201-9013, University of Liverpool, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Linda Kalof |
| Year | 2017 |
| Pages | 570-590 |
| Publication date | 2017-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927142.013.19 |
| OpenAlex | W2174551145 |
| ISBN | 9780199927142 |
| Language | EN |
Both “animals” and “religion” are contentious concepts, with many possible meanings and associations. This chapter takes animals to be eukaryotes distinct from protists, plants and fungi, and “religion” as the attempt to “live a dream.” I describe four principal ways of dreaming animals: triumphalist humanism (for which only “human” beings are of any interest); traditional notions of good husbandry (which requires “human” beings to care for the non-human, within limits set by human interests); notions of metempsychosis and transformation (where “human” and “non-human” are constantly shifting characters); and awakening to the real presence of others, and so—paradoxically—evacuating them of merely “religious” meaning.
Aesthetics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Humanism · Meaning (existential) · Non-human · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
| Highly cited | No |
|---|