Diplomacy and domestic politics
The logic of two-level games
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23639524 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert D Putnam (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Pages | 437-470 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | International Organization (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781315251981-16 |
| OpenAlex | W3139789705 |
| ISBN | 9781315251981 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Domestic politics and international relations are often somehow entangled, but our theories have not yet sorted out the puzzling tangle. It is fruitless to debate whether domestic politics really determine international relations, or the reverse. The answer to that question is clearly “Both, sometimes.” The more interesting questions are “When?” and “How?” This article offers a theoretical approach to this issue, but I begin with a story that illustrates the puzzle.
Diplomacy · Economics · Game theory · International relations · International relations theory · Law and economics · Legislature · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Ratification · Sociology · State (computer science) · Treaty · European Union Policy and Governance · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Parliamentary Supervision of Brazilian Foreign Policy
The Breakdown of International Negotiations
Between collective action and a fragmented political economy
The nuclear education of Donald J. Trump
Virtual ethnography of “China travel” content
The internal-external nexus in moderation processes
Soft law or hard law? Quantitative evidence from the legalization of Asean instruments
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.54 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |