Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

General conclusion

Bibliographic Data

ID23639670
AuthorsDavid Omissi (corresponding author), David E Omissi
Year2017
Publication date2017-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueAir Power and Colonial Control (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherManchester University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.7765/9781526123589.00022
OpenAlexW4256652093
ISBN9781526123589
LanguageEN

The dominant concern of British defence policy in the few years after the Great War was to reduce military expenditure while at the same time retaining control of the territories. Air power changed the military relationship between the Protectorate tribes and the Aden government, and set in train a process of growing mutual dependence which culminated in the emergence of an independent South Yemeni state. The air force was not the only element involved, but it would be reasonable to claim that the modern frontiers of South Yemen, Jordan and Iraq are in part a legacy of air policing. The air control scheme offered the British government the magical formula of continued control with reduced expenditure, and this unorthodox method offered one solution to a central dilemma of post-war imperialism. The survival of the Royal Air Force (RAF) in the 1920s had far reaching implications.

Colonialism · Dilemma · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Political science · Power (physics) · Protectorate · State (computer science) · History · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Military History and Strategy · Philosophy · Public Administration · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae