General Conclusions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23643141 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Taylor (0000-0002-9189-3187, corresponding author), Steve Taylor (0009-0007-4684-5956) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Pages | 194-196 |
| Publication date | 1982-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Durkheim and the Study of Suicide (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Macmillan Education UK (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-349-16792-0_9 |
| OpenAlex | W4242301110 |
| ISBN | 9781349167920 |
| Language | EN |
The research undertaken in this book has suggested, in opposition to Durkheim and the sociological tradition apparently following him, that official suicide rates are a most inappropriate source of data for suicide research and that suicidal actions will not be satisfactorily explained without reference to the actor’s intentions and the micro-social context of his action. However, this view of sociological studies did not lead to an acceptance of what may be termed ‘individually orientated’ approaches, one variety of which locates the causes of suicide in factors physically ‘inside’ the individual as opposed to ‘outside’ in his environment, while another argues that suicide has to be ‘understood’ in terms of the meaning that the individual ‘constructs’ for his own action.
Action (physics) · Epistemology · Meaning (existential) · Opposition (politics) · Political science · Politics · Psychotherapist · Social science · Sociological research · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |