The Consensus Undermined
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23643247 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence Freedman (The King's College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Pages | 344-358 |
| Publication date | 1983-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_23 |
| OpenAlex | W2467821724 |
| ISBN | 9781349042715 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
The strategic debates of the 1970s in the United States could not be restricted to a qualified few, versed in the mysteries of the atom and informed through the most secret sources. The debate was noisy, even cacophonous, and frequently linked to wider issues, such as Presidential elections and the struggle to establish the demarcation line between executive and legislative spheres of competence, and embracing all parts of the political system. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Competence (human resources) · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Public relations · Sociology · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Science Research and Education · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|