Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Forbidding Mourning

Bibliographic Data

ID23650708
AuthorsMichèle Lowrie (corresponding author)
Year1997
Pages77-93
Publication date1997-07-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueHorace's narrative Odes (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780198150534.003.0004
OpenAlexW4388372051
ISBN9780198150534
LanguageEN

Memory in Odes I — 3 looks forward: the monumentum does not so much preserve the past as project Horace’s future immortality. Death, for Horace, has no sting. How then to cope with the death of others, particularly with the primary impulse arising from death and memory that is mourning? Can poetry compensate for death? Does a place exist for mourning in a poetics of presence? The usual threat to the ethics of carpe diem arises from anxiety about the future (death); less frequent, but no less disruptive, is brooding over the past (mourning). The injunction of C. I. 24, I. 33, and 2. 9 offers a simple answer: ‘don’t mourn’. But — there is always a ‘but’ — the very injunction not to mourn inscribes others’ mourning on the tombstone of the monumentum. Furthermore, the alternative Horace offers in C. 2. 9, praise Augustus Caesar, disturbs (Putnam 1990).

Art · Immortality · Impulse (physics) · Literature · Poetics · Poetry · Praise · Psychoanalysis · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae