Why Spivak?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23656151 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alecia Youngblood Jackson (0000-0001-5016-6752), L A Mazzei (0000-0002-4312-3938) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Pages | 37-39 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781315667768-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4281756541 |
| ISBN | 9781315667768 |
| Language | EN |
Eagleton is gesturing toward Gayatri Spivak, whose deconstructive project is a critique of postcolonialism. Spivak goes on to write that what are being reclaimed are “regulative political concepts” that have been inherited from Western Europe; thus, she rejects postcolonialism as an adequate referent for the times because decolonization has not happened. In some feminist literature (e.g., bell hooks, Audre Lorde), the margin is positioned as a radical space separate from the center; the margin is a positive, creative site of resistance that minoritized individuals can inhabit to secure their difference. Spivak relies on Foucault’s concept of puissance/connaissance (power/knowledge) to position the teaching machine (the academy) as a vehicle of power/knowledge that seeks to locate and define what counts as authentic inhabitants of the margin.
Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies · Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |