Rome and Serdica
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23656256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sara Parvis (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Pages | 179-253 |
| Publication date | 2006-03-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Marcellus of Ancyra and the lost years of the Arian controversy, 325-345 (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0199280134.003.0006 |
| OpenAlex | W2501925799 |
| ISBN | 9780199280131 |
| Open Library | OL22722651M |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
This chapter examines the moves toward a second Ecumenical Council in the years after the second depositions of Athanasius and Marcellus. Constantius’ brother, Constans, is presented as a central figure in the negotiations, perhaps from as early as 340. It is argued that the decisions of the Synod of Rome, here dated to Spring 341, were not intended to be binding on the East in the absence of any Eastern bishops, but merely addressed the local problem of whether or not to continue to treat Athanasius and Marcellus as bishops in the absence of convincing evidence that they had been validly deposed. The works written by Athanasius and Marcellus in Rome at this time, the First Oration against the Arians, the Letter to Julius, and probably On the Holy Church (De Sancta Ecclesia), are examined. It is argued that all draw on a statement agreed between the two concerning a heresy, which Athanasius calls the Arian heresy and Marcellus calls Ariomania. The signatories and documents of the Eastern and Western synods of Serdica are minutely examined, and argued to show that the two alliances were now in a process of realignment. Marcellus and Athanasius were in fundamental disagreement over whether or not to issue a statement adding to the Nicene Creed, and most of the Easterners were not in as intransigent a mood as the letter written in their name might suggest. Marcellus withdrew from public engagement with the controversy shortly afterwards to obviate the need to choose between a breach with Athanasius or with his own pupil Photinus of Sirmium. He died nearly 30 years later in communion with the former, without ever having condemned the latter.
Ancient history · Bishops · Creed · Heresy · Patristics · Political science · Statement (logic) · Synod · Theology · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · History · Law · Philosophy
Nicaea and its Legacy
Zur Geschichte der Alten Kirche und ihres Rechts
Zum altrömischen Bekenntnis. Ein Beitrag des Marcellus von Ancyra
Die Bischöfe Metrophanes Und Alexandros Von Byzanz
Divine Substance
Demography
Paul of Constantinople
Patrum Nicaenorum nomina Latine, Graece, Coptice, Syriace, Arabice, Armeniace
The Date of the Deposition of Eustathius of Antioch
The Date of the Council of Gangra
When Did the Arian Controversy Begin
Constantine's Speech to the Assembly of the Saints
The Canons of Ancyra and Caesarea (314)
The Fall of Eustathius of Antioch
Marcellus of Ancyra and the Councils of Ad 325
Marcellus of Ancyra (Pseudo-Anthimus), 'On the Holy Church
Gottes Wesen, Logos, Weisheit Und Kraft Bei Asterius Von Kappadokien Und Markell Von Ankyra
Die antinizanische Synodalaktensammlung des Sabinus von Heraklea
Clement of Alexandria and His Doctrine of the Logos
A Neglected Detail in the Creed of Nicaea (325)
| Highly cited | No |
|---|