Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Excavating Theogonies

Anthropomorphic Promiscuity and Sociographic Prudery in the Neolithic and Now

Bibliographic Data

ID23665288
AuthorsF Leron Shults (0000-0002-0588-6977, corresponding author)
Year2014
Pages58-85
Publication date2014-02-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueReligion at Work in a Neolithic Society (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9781107239043.005
OpenAlexW2499334108
ISBN9781107239043
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited17

Introduction Where do babies come from? Archaeologists do not need to dig around for an answer to this question as they attempt to understand and explain the empirical data uncovered at Çatalhöyük, other sites in the Neolithic, or elsewhere. They certainly need to search for plausible hypotheses to illuminate the vital kinship structures, pregnancy rituals, birthing practices, and neonatal health care policies of any specific community. However, if the community was composed of Homo sapiens , archaeologists can appropriately assume that infants appeared within the population as a result of the same basic procedures that produce them today, when – well, you know. The inhabitants of Çatalhöyük were anatomically modern humans and naturally reproduced in the same way that we do. Where do gods come from? In this chapter I will argue that archaeologists (as well as other scientists, philosophers, and theologians) can now also appropriately assume that the reproduction of supernatural agents in Çatalhöyük occurred in much the same way that it does today, at least in small-scale societies. Although we have known where babies come from for several millennia, only within the last few decades have we come to understand more fully why gods appear (and are cared for) in human populations. As with the process of bearing children, one finds an astonishing variety of ways of ritually surrounding and socially manipulating the process of bearing supernatural agents. Beliefs about and behaviors toward the latter are regulated and transmitted differently in the major religious traditions that were forged within complex literate states during the axial age and now dominate the global landscape. Nevertheless, all members of our species share a phylogenetic heritage that includes sets of cognitive and coalitional tendencies, which together help to explain why gods are so easily born(e) across cultures in time and space.

Archaeology · Biology · Ethnology · Evolutionary biology · Genealogy · Geography · Homo sapiens · Kinship · Population · Promiscuity · Sociology · Anthropology · Demography · Ecology · History · Infant Health and Development · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs

  • Religion at work in a Neolithic society

    Ian Davidson•Australian Archaeology•2016

  • Can theism be defeated? CSR and the debunking of supernatural agent abductions

    F Leron Shults•Religion Brain & Behavior•2016

  • Faces in the Clouds

    Stewart Guthrie, Stewart Elliott Guthrie•Faces in the Clouds•1993

  • Violence and the Sacred

    René Girard•Violence and the sacred•1979

  • The Scapegoat

    René Girard, Yvonne Freccero•Scapegoat•1989

  • Supernatural Selection

    Matt J Rossano, Matt Rossano et al.•Supernatural selection•2010

  • Religion in the Emergence of Civilization

    Open Access•LeRon Shults, J Wentzel van Huyssteen et al.•Religion in the Emergence of…•2010

  • Evolution, Culture, and the Human Mind

    Steven Heine, Mark Schaller et al.•Evolution, Culture, and the Human…•2011

  • Minds and Gods

    Todd Tremlin, E Thomas Lawson•Minds and gods•2006

  • Bringing Ritual to Mind

    Open Access•Robert N Mccauley, E Thomas Lawson•Bringing Ritual to Mind•2002

  • In Gods We Trust

    Open Access•Atran, Scott Atran•In Gods We Trust•2002

  • In the Name of God

    Open Access•John Teehan•In the Name of God•2010

  • Bearing gods in mind and culture

    F Leron Shults•Religion Brain & Behavior•2011

  • Violence and the Sacred

    Open Access•René Girard, Aisha Karim et al.•On Violence•1979

  • A Cognitive Theory of Religion [and Comments and Reply]

    Stewart Guthrie, Joseph Agassi et al.•Current Anthropology•1980

  • On a Cognitive Theory of Religion

    M F C Bourdillon, Michael Bourdillon et al.•Current Anthropology•1980

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2016 - 2016 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae