Excavating Theogonies
Anthropomorphic Promiscuity and Sociographic Prudery in the Neolithic and Now
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23665288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | F Leron Shults (0000-0002-0588-6977, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Pages | 58-85 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9781107239043.005 |
| OpenAlex | W2499334108 |
| ISBN | 9781107239043 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 17 |
Introduction Where do babies come from? Archaeologists do not need to dig around for an answer to this question as they attempt to understand and explain the empirical data uncovered at Çatalhöyük, other sites in the Neolithic, or elsewhere. They certainly need to search for plausible hypotheses to illuminate the vital kinship structures, pregnancy rituals, birthing practices, and neonatal health care policies of any specific community. However, if the community was composed of Homo sapiens , archaeologists can appropriately assume that infants appeared within the population as a result of the same basic procedures that produce them today, when – well, you know. The inhabitants of Çatalhöyük were anatomically modern humans and naturally reproduced in the same way that we do. Where do gods come from? In this chapter I will argue that archaeologists (as well as other scientists, philosophers, and theologians) can now also appropriately assume that the reproduction of supernatural agents in Çatalhöyük occurred in much the same way that it does today, at least in small-scale societies. Although we have known where babies come from for several millennia, only within the last few decades have we come to understand more fully why gods appear (and are cared for) in human populations. As with the process of bearing children, one finds an astonishing variety of ways of ritually surrounding and socially manipulating the process of bearing supernatural agents. Beliefs about and behaviors toward the latter are regulated and transmitted differently in the major religious traditions that were forged within complex literate states during the axial age and now dominate the global landscape. Nevertheless, all members of our species share a phylogenetic heritage that includes sets of cognitive and coalitional tendencies, which together help to explain why gods are so easily born(e) across cultures in time and space.
Archaeology · Biology · Ethnology · Evolutionary biology · Genealogy · Geography · Homo sapiens · Kinship · Population · Promiscuity · Sociology · Anthropology · Demography · Ecology · History · Infant Health and Development · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Faces in the Clouds
Violence and the Sacred
The Scapegoat
Supernatural Selection
Religion in the Emergence of Civilization
Evolution, Culture, and the Human Mind
Minds and Gods
Bringing Ritual to Mind
In Gods We Trust
In the Name of God
Bearing gods in mind and culture
Violence and the Sacred
A Cognitive Theory of Religion [and Comments and Reply]
On a Cognitive Theory of Religion
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |