Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Taiwan Archaeology

In and Out of Chinese Archaeology

Bibliographic Data

ID23667366
AuthorsFrank Muyard (École Française d'Extrême-Orient, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages679-702
Publication date2026-07-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueThe Oxford Handbook of the History and Practice of Chinese Archaeology (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0035
OpenAlexW7170040501
ISBN9780197800324
LanguageEN
References cited17

The significance of Taiwan prehistory for Asia-Pacific archaeology is well documented, especially through research on Austronesian origins and dispersal. But the history of Taiwan archaeology, 125 years old, its links with Chinese archaeology, and its unique specificities, are largely unknown abroad. This chapter proposes an historical and sociological perspective on the making of modern Taiwan archaeology. It introduces the main phases of its development from its beginning in 1896 under Japanese colonialism (1895–1945) to its current state and analyses its specificities in comparison with other East Asian archaeologies. It looks in particular at the way archaeological institutions have been shaped by Taiwan’s post-WWII history, notably Chinese nationalism, American influence, Taiwanisation, and the rise of Austronesian indigenous identity. Archaeological research was divided between the Chinese national archaeology undertaken at Academia Sinica by archaeologists in exile under Li Chi and the Taiwanese local archaeology carried out at National Taiwan University that built on the achievements of Japanese archaeologists. After the end of this institutional division in the 1970s, research in Chinese archaeology has continued on the relics of Anyang and other major sites on the mainland as well as in new fieldwork conducted in China through international projects. Under the influence of K. C. Chang and Sung Wen-hsun, archaeological priorities gradually shifted toward the island’s pre- and protohistoric past and regional interactions. Two other issues are also highlighted: archaeology’s relations to the state and the interaction between the archaeological community and indigenous peoples.

China · Colonialism · Indigenous · Mainland · Mainland China · Prehistoric archaeology · Prehistory · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies

  • First Farmers and their Coastal Adaptation in Prehistoric Taiwan

    Open Access•Kuang‐ti Li, Li Kuang‐Ti•A Companion to Chinese Archaeology•2013

  • Public Archaeology in Korea

    Open Access•Oh Young Kwon, Moo Joong Kim•New Perspectives in Global Public…•2011

  • History and Current Debates of Archaeology in Island Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Hsiao-Chun Hung•Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology•2020

  • A History of Chinese Archaeology

    Open Access•Li Liu, Liu Li•Handbook of East and Southeast…•2017

  • The regionalist paradigm in Chinese archaeology

    Open Access•Lothar Von Falkenhausen•Nationalism, Politics and the…•1996

  • Practice of Archaeology in Contemporary Japan

    Open Access•Fumiko Ikawa-Smith, Fumiko Ikawa‐smith•Comparative Archaeologies•2011

  • The Movement to Indigenize the Social Sciences in Taiwan

    Open Access•Mau–kuei Chang, Maukuei Chang•Cultural, Ethnic, and Political…•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae