Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nudity and Divine Symbols

Bibliographic Data

ID23685254
AuthorsChristopher H Hallett (corresponding author)
Year2005
Pages223-270
Publication date2005-09-29
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueROMAN NUDE: HEROIC PORTRAIT STATUARY, 200 BC-AD 300. (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780199240494.003.0007
OpenAlexW4388357545
ISBN9780199240494
LanguageEN

The portraits of women in the guise of goddesses (Pls. 123–4) actually return us to a controversial issue which we have skirted a number of times already, but which now needs to be squarely faced. In the last chapter we attempted to explain why it was that Romans chose to have themselves represented in heroic costume (nude and carrying weapons). But a question of equal importance still remains to be asked. What did it mean when nude portraits were furnished—not with weapons— but with divine attributes (as in Pls. 96 and 99)? Once again the question can only be approached by drawing on, and taking account of, a wide array of different kinds of evidence. And in this case, before we can even begin our discussion, we must first address two widespread modern misconceptions: misconceptions about the general significance of nudity in Roman art, and the use of divine attributesin Hellenistic and Roman portraiture.

Art · Art history · Chose · Literature · Political science · Portrait · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae