Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spiraling into Control

Paradoxes of Thermodynamic Rationalization

Bibliographic Data

ID23698798
AuthorsJan Overwijk (0000-0002-7093-2992)
Year2025
Pages55-92
Publication date2025-01-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueCybernetic Capitalism (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherFordham University Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5422/fordham/9781531508920.003.0003
ISBN9781531508920
LanguageEN

Developed by Max Weber and the Frankfurt School, the theory of rationalization holds that instrumental reason increasingly drives out forms of political reason. Modernity is thus caught up in a technical logic of closure that eclipses its emancipatory promise, ending in Weber’s “iron cage” or Adorno and Horkheimer’s “totally administered society.” The problem with this narrative, however, is that it turns on a separation between technics and politics that is empirically and politically problematic. This chapter surveys the tenability of the theory of rationalization on the basis of Science and Technology Studies literature. It argues that rationalization’s logic of closure should be interpreted as Niklas Luhmann’s “operational closure,” which paradoxically produces political openness. This offers a critical systems theoretic vision that preserves critical theory’s core intuition of social closure while underlining the historical and political nature of instrumental reason by working through its paradoxical logic.

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae