Third Parties and Television Debates
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23700540 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Holmes (0000-0003-4839-3563, corresponding author), RICHARD HOLME |
| Year | 2000 |
| Pages | 92-103 |
| Publication date | 2000-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Televised Election Debates (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/9780230379602_5 |
| OpenAlex | W2475390510 |
| ISBN | 9780230379602 |
| Language | EN |
Should third, or other, parties be included in television debates between party leaders at elections? The most immediate response might be ‘why not?’ If parties are offering themselves as democratic alternatives and if television represents, as it does in most societies, a recognised medium of electoral communication why should any electronic hustings not include the leaders of the alternative party options which are being set before the voters? Yet there are several arguments of varying merit which might militate for the exclusion of all but the two leading players.
Advertising · Business · Democracy · Media studies · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Social Media and Politics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|