Economic Expertise in Postcapitalist Democratic Economic Planning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2371307 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ellen D Russell (0000-0003-3185-6525, Wilfrid Laurier University), Simon Tremblay-Pepin (0000-0003-2317-0216, Saint Paul University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 291-304 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0896-9205 • E-ISSN: 1569-1632 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/08969205251329582 |
| OpenAlex | W4409380510 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Postcapitalist democratic economic planning (DEP) seeks to democratize economic decision-making. In response to the failures of central planning, DEP is vigilant lest the emergence of some new elite subvert its democratic and egalitarian aspirations. This article considers the possibility that economic expertise intended to support DEP may be means through which new elites are covertly encouraged. DEP advocates seek to safeguard DEP processes from elite control by proposing institutional oversight structures combined with enhanced subjective oversight capacities. In the case of economic expertise, we contend that these responses mitigate the possibility that economists' analyses will have preferential implications but do not resolve this antidemocratic possibility. Economic expertise poses a problem of democratic accountability because its technical opacity impedes democratic oversight, thus enabling the covert design of economic analysis in ways that favour some groups over others. We conclude by arguing that reconsidering economic expertise in postcapitalism can attenuate this tension
Democracy · Economic democracy · Economic planning · Economic system · Economics · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Political Economy and Marxism
Between labor and capital
Epistemic Dependence
The Political Economy of Participatory Economics
Democracy and Economic Planning, the Political Economy of a Self-Governing Society
Unorthodox Marxism
Democratic Economic Planning, Social Metabolism and the Environment
The New Class
The Greek Polis and the Creation of Democracy
Democratic Economic Planning
Postcapitalism
Planning for Conflict
Are Services Post-Capitalist? A Marxian Interrogation
Failing to Plan Is Planning to Fail
Middle Class Decline? The Growth of Professional-Managers in the Neoliberal Era
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |