Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship

Bibliographic Data

ID23729043
AuthorsHeiko Rauhut (0000-0002-1181-5534, University of Zurich), F Winter (0000-0002-4838-4504, University of Zurich), David Johann (0000-0002-8970-9686, University of Zurich)
Year2018
Pages1-14
Publication date2018-12-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeOTHER
VenueEmerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL)
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0459
OpenAlexW2905406100
ISBN9781118900772
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited23

Scientific authorship has become a hot topic in the social sciences. We present three avenues addressing this topic from different perspectives to illustrate in which direction research on inequalities in the context of scientific authorship and academic publications may move. We draw on data from the Web of Science focusing on the field of sociology. We demonstrate that (i) the alphabetical order of co‐authors' names sends out an ambiguous signal about the actual contributions of each team member, (ii) attention is increasingly paid to a few contributions that are widely cited, and (iii) well‐connected authors tend to work together. In short, this essay suggests a rise in authorship inequalities regarding the attention authors and their articles receive. Sociology and related social sciences are arguably developing into academic winner‐take‐all markets.

Context (archaeology) · Data science · Economics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Inequality · Order (exchange) · Social inequality · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · History · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Wikis in Education and Collaboration

  • Perceptions of Scientific Authorship Revisited

    Open Access•David Johann•Science and Engineering Ethics•2022

  • Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations

    Open Access•A L Barabási, H Jeong et al.•Physica A Statistical Mechanics…•2002

  • What is research collaboration?

    Open Access•J Sylvan Katz, Ben R Martin•Research Policy•1997

  • Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration

    Open Access•M E J Newman•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge

    Open Access•Stefan Wuchty, Beau Fly Jones et al.•Science•2007

  • The structure of scientific collaboration networks

    Open Access•M E J Newman•Proceedings of the National…•2001

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences

    Richard Whitley•The intellectual and social…•2000

  • Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality

    T Diprete, Thomas A Diprete et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2006

  • Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification

    Phillip Bonacich•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1972

  • The social construction of reality

    Peter L Berger, Peter L Luckmann Thomas A Berger et al.•The social construction of reality•1967

  • Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science

    Open Access•Sahra Jabbehdari, John P Walsh•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • The Matthew Effect in Science, II

    Robert Κ Merton, Robert K Merton•Isis•1988

  • Structural Holes and Good Ideas

    R S Burt•American Journal of Sociology•2004

  • Power and Centrality

    Phillip Bonacich•American Journal of Sociology•1987

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae