Literature and Decolonization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23730693 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Forsdick (0000-0001-7470-8421, University of Liverpool, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Martin Thomas (0000-0002-2261-5888), Andrew S Thompson |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 732-713 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Oxford Handbook of the Ends of Empire (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198713197.013.36 |
| OpenAlex | W2792448912 |
| ISBN | 9780198713197 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The recasting of decolonization through the lens of cultural agents demands a recognition that a key element of the process of uncoupling colonizer and colonized involves the imagination (or re-imagination) of postcolonial futures. These practices take place in novels, poetry, and theatre as much as they do in law, philosophy, or political theory. An expanded focus on the cultures of decolonization emphasizes, at the same time, the transnational networks on which colonized cultures depend as they seek to decolonize, highlighting the cross-cultural and often intercontinental exchanges and translations of ideas and representations which make up the literary and cultural dimensions of decolonization. This chapter analyses the ways in which different forms of writing, particularly fiction, provide insights into the critical yet neglected question of how the end of empire was narrated by those who lived through it and who later, in various ways, sought to reconcile themselves to it.
Aesthetics · Art · Decolonization · Element (criminal law) · Empire · Epistemology · Literature · Poetry · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,11 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |