The Phylai
Instruments of Representation?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23744196 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas F Jones (0000-0001-5964-8037, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Pages | 174-194 |
| Publication date | 1999-02-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The associations of Classical Athens (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressNew York, NY (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780195121759.003.0007 |
| OpenAlex | W4388390887 |
| ISBN | 9780195121759 |
| Language | EN |
If phyletai did not regularly fraternize or feel or express strong bonds of attachment with each other qua phyletai, it does not follow that the organization was entirely without vitality or purpose. In fact, the phylai will emerge as vigorous, purposeful organizations thanks in large part to the ambitions and energies of a relatively few individuals, usually but not demonstrably in every instance their officers. What do we know about these phyletai?
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics) · Sociology · Theology · Vitality · Historical and Literary Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|