Canada
Executive Dominance and Presidentialization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23745829 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herman Bakvis, Steven B Wolinetz |
| Year | 2005 |
| Pages | 199-220 |
| Publication date | 2005-03-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The presidentialization of politics (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0199252017.003.0009 |
| OpenAlex | W2488044560 |
| ISBN | 9780199252015 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 10 |
A parliamentary democracy based on the Westminster model, Canada does not qualify formally as a presidential system: The prime minister and other members of the political executive are responsible to a popularly elected House of Commons. Nonetheless, the Canadian prime minister enjoys wide-ranging powers that in practice are far more extensive than those enjoyed by prime ministers in other Westminster systems. The nature of the leadership selection process, strict party discipline and a fragmented opposition, help ensure prime ministerial dominance over both parliament and cabinet. So too do strong central agencies. While personalization and popularization of prime ministerial leadership is not as pronounced in Canada as in the UK, it is nevertheless an important factor. Prime ministers are beholden to very few interests in their parties, which they dominate. In the Canadian system, one finds many of the characteristics of presidentialization without any of the formal attributes. Federalism and the strength of the provinces act as the major constraint on prime ministerial power. In important respects, Canadian prime ministers are more powerful than presidents in some presidential systems.
Cabinet (room) · Dominance (genetics) · Federalism · Geography · House of Commons · Opposition (politics) · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Prime (order theory) · Prime minister · Separation of powers · Sociology · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration
Masters of Our Own Destiny
The Impact of the Charter
Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause
Political Time in a Westminster Democracy
Citizens and the public perception of lobbying
Accountability in a collectivized environment
Lopsided lobbying? Regulatory opportunism and the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying
Follow the (Issue) Leader? The Leader-Led Nexus Revisited
Two routes to personalized politics
The Presidentialisation Thesis and Parliamentary Budget Offices
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,53 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2025 (19) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |