Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Six Masculine Roles in International Relations and Their Interconnection

A Personal Investigation

Bibliographic Data

ID23747630
AuthorsCraig N Murphy (0000-0002-1444-3473, corresponding author)
Year2019
Pages93-108
Publication date2019-04-05
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueMan Question in International Relations (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9780429061073-6
OpenAlexW2955460675
ISBN9780429061073
LanguageEN

This chapter examines why many of the male scholars in international relations who are sympathetic to feminist studies of gender and international affairs, men who even lend such studies institutional support and who certainly have learned a great deal from them. It considers how the roles may relate to each other in the gendered structuring of power internationally and how the interests of men who play different roles may make them more likely or less likely to sympathize with the challenge offered by feminist understandings. The logic of masculinities is hierarchical in the sense that the masculine virtues of one of the roles—that of the good soldier—are privileged by the entire network of distinctions that define the different types of masculinity in the United States. The masculine role that military sons learn about first is of central importance, namely being the good soldier.

International relations · Masculinity · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Structuring · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae