A Genealogy of the Durbar
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23760973 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Apter (0009-0006-0097-2880, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Pages | 167-199 |
| Publication date | 2013-03-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Pan-African Nation (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7208/chicago/9780226023564.003.0006 |
| OpenAlex | W2494831575 |
| ISBN | 9780226023564 |
| Language | EN |
The case of the Nigerian durbar carries the arguments and perspectives of Mitchell and Bourdieu into the postcolonial situations of third world nation-states. Following Mitchell's discussions of the emergence of “the state” and “the economy” not as functional domains of institutional differentiation but as representational “effects” of modern political practices, the domain of “culture” is considered in a similar light. The point here is not merely synthetic, adding a new domain variable to Mitchell's analysis of the state, but instead follows his radical shift in perspective on the very processes of institutional differentiation and objectification. In brief, this refers historically to the practical and technical demarcation of internal distinctions—“methods of organization, arrangement and representation”—that come to be seen as external boundaries between the state and civil society, the state and a “free” market, or in the case of the Nigerian durbar, the state and its national “culture.”
Art · Domain (mathematical analysis) · Epistemology · Objectification · Perspective (graphical) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics) · Sociology · State (computer science) · African cultural and philosophical studies · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |