Just Marriage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23764889 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mary Lyndon Shanley (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Publication date | 2004-09-23 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Just Marriage (New Democracy Forum/Boston Review) (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressNew York, NY (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780195176254.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4388083286 |
| ISBN | 9780195176254 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
From the ground breaking legal decisions on gay marriage to the promotion of marriage for low-income families, the “sacred institution” of marriage has turned into a public battleground. Who should be allowed to marry and is marriage a public or private act? Should marriage be abandoned completely? Or should marriage be redefined as a civil institution that promotes sexual and racial equality? As the fierce national debate over same-sex marriage and civil unions continues, Mary Lyndon Shanley argues that while the state should continue to play a role in regulating personal relations, the law must be fundamentally reformed if marriage is to become a more just institution. Fourteen prominent writers and thinkers respond, including Nancy F. Cott, William N. Eskridge, Jr., Amitai Etzioni, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cass R. Sunstein.
Institution · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess) · Sociology · State (computer science) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law
Kinship Trouble
The Dyadic Imaginary
Investing in Couple Relationship Education in the UK
Care, Oppression, and Marriage
Raising One Eyebrow and Re‐envisioning Justice, Gender, and the Family
Gay Divorce
The Status of Women and Jews in Moses Mendelssohn's Social Contract Theory
Measurement of Marital Readiness to Avoid Possible Divorce
Do government sponsored marriage promotion policies place undue pressure on individual rights
The Liberal Case for Disestablishing Marriage
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,53 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2022 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |