Differences in Coaching Philosophies Between Male Coaches of Male and Female Basketball Teams

Bibliographic Data

ID2379176
AuthorsStephen R Pratt (College of Saint Benedict, St. Joseph, Minnesota 56374, U.S.A.), D Stanley Eitzen (College of Saint Benedict, St. Joseph, Minnesota 56374, U.S.A.)
Year1989
Volume24
Issue2
Pages151-161
Publication date1989-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review for the Sociology of Sport (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1012-6902 • E-ISSN: 1461-7218
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/101269028902400205
OpenAlexW2048022575
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

Within the universal set of constraints placed on coaches, there is variation in their beliefs, philosophies, and coaching procedures. Some coaches are especially autocratic and demanding while others are more democratic and humane in their relationship with players. This paper examines the question of whether there are significant differences in the coaching philosophies between male coaches of male basketball and male coaches of female basketball teams. Questionnaires were mailed to the head coach of boys' and girls' basketball teams in 600 randomly selected high schools. One hundred items were examined to determine the similarities and differences in philosophical beliefs and behaviors between male coaches of male teams and male coaches of female teams. For the thirty-two (32) items where there was a statistically significant difference, a distinct pattern emerged, male coaches of male teams were more traditional, autocratic, and demanding when compared to the male coaches of female teams

Athletes · Autocracy · Basketball · Coaching · Democracy · Physical therapy · Political science · Psychotherapist · Significant difference · Applied Psychology · Medicine · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Physical Education and Pedagogy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub