Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Death of the Ethic of Life

Bibliographic Data

ID23792050
AuthorsJohn Basl (0000-0003-2056-4201, corresponding author)
Year2019
Publication date2019-03-28
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueDeath of the Ethic of Life (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780190923877.001.0001
OpenAlexW2924079068
ISBN9780190923877
LanguageEN
Citations received14

According to the ethic of life, all living organisms are of special moral importance. Living things, unlike simple artifacts or biological collectives, are not mere things whose value is entirely instrumental. This book articulates why the ethic is immune to most of the standard criticisms raised against it, but also why such an ethic is untenable, why the domain of moral concern does not extend to all living things; it argues for an old conclusion in an entirely new way. To see why the ethic must be abandoned requires that we look carefully at the foundations of the ethic—the ways in which it is tightly connected to issues in the philosophy of biology and the sorts of assumptions it must draw on to distinguish the living from the nonliving. This book draws on resources from a variety of branches of philosophy and the sciences to show that the ethic cannot survive this scrutiny, and it articulates what the death of the ethic of life means in a variety of areas of practical concern, including environmental ethics, biomedical ethics, ethics of technology, and in philosophy more generally.

Applied ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Scrutiny · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Variety (cybernetics) · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy

  • Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction analysis of disorder and the problem of defining harm to nonsentient organisms

    Open Access•Antoine C Dussault•Metamedicine•2021

  • Alleviating the burden of malaria with gene drive technologies? A biocentric analysis of the moral permissibility of modifying malaria mosquitoes

    Nienke de Graeff, Karin R Jongsma et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Nonanthropocentric climate ethics

    Open Access•John Nolt, Trevor Hedberg•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2024

  • The role of ethical reflection and dialogue in conceptualising animal welfare

    Open Access•Simon Coghlan•Journal of Agricultural and…•2022

  • Empathic responses and moral status for social robots

    Open Access•Simon N Balle•AI & Society•2022

  • Sentient dignity and the plausible inclusion of animals

    Open Access•Matthew W Perry•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2025

  • The Other Species Capability & the Power of Wonder

    Jeremy Bendik-Keymer•Journal of Human Development•2021

  • Will intelligent machines become moral patients

    Open Access•Parisa Moosavi•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Once more, without feeling

    Open Access•Andreas L Mogensen•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • An evaluation of the autopoietic account of interests

    Open Access•Hoffmann•Synthese•2022

  • Against etiological function accounts of interests

    Open Access•Katie Mcshane•Synthese•2021

  • Invasive species and natural function in ecology

    Open Access•Christopher Hunter Lean•Synthese•2021

  • The function argument for ascribing interests

    Open Access•Parisa Moosavi•Synthese•2024

  • Beneficial relations between species & the moral responsibility of wondering

    Jeremy Bendik-Keymer•Environmental Politics•2022

Unique citing works14
Citations per year2.8
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae