Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Offences and Defences

Bibliographic Data

ID23797335
AuthorsJohn Gardner (0000-0001-7417-348X, corresponding author)
Year2007
Publication date2007-11-08
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueOffences and defences (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239351.001.0001
OpenAlexW2477834896
ISBN9780199239351
LanguageEN
Citations received29

This book collects together a selection of John Gardner's best-known and most provocative writings on the theory of criminal law. Gardner tackles persistent and troublesome questions about the philosophical foundations of the criminal law. Which wrongs are suitable to be crimes and why? What are the conditions of criminal responsibility, and how do they relate to the conditions of moral responsibility? What does it take to be complicit in another's wrongdoing? Should crimes ever be excused, and if so, on what basis? How, if at all, should the criminal law adapt to conditions of social and cultural diversity? The issues raised in these essays have a significance extending beyond the law. What does it mean to be a responsible agent and why does it matter? Is my moral character only or mostly my own business? Is there a difference between being reasonable and being rational? These and many other moral problems lurk in the background of the criminal law, and the pieces in this book bring them into the foreground. Theoretical writings on the criminal law have often been dominated by a preoccupation with the justification of criminal punishment. This work is different. Although it discusses the legitimacy of criminal punishment, it proceeds on the footing that the criminal law does many important things apart from punishing people. In particular, Gardner argues that the criminal law provides an important forum for people to explain themselves. Such a forum would be important, argues Gardner, even if criminal punishment were to be abolished.

Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Psychology

  • Criminal punishment and the right to rule

    Malcolm Thorburn•University of Toronto Law Journal•2020

  • The legacy of H.L.A. Hart

    Matthew H Kramer, Claire Grant et al.•The legacy of H.L.A. Hart•2008

  • A Liberal Defense of Sex Exceptionalism

    Open Access•Connor K Kianpour•Hypatia•2026

  • The Basic Liberties

    Philip Pettit•The legacy of H.L.A. Hart•2008

  • Fairness, Needs, and Desert

    Brad Hooker•The legacy of H.L.A. Hart•2008

  • Are ‘Dirty Hands’ Possible

    Open Access•Stephen De Wijze•The Journal of Ethics•2024

  • Agent-Regret, Accidents, and Respect

    Open Access•Jake Wojtowicz•The Journal of Ethics•2022

  • Mistreating Consent

    Open Access•Elise Woodard•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2026

  • Epistemic Blame and the New Evil Demon Problem

    Open Access•Cristina Ballarini•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Two grounds of liability

    Open Access•Victor Tadros•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Owning failure

    Open Access•Ulrike Heuer•Philosophical Studies•2026

  • Coercion, Consent, and Time

    Michelle Madden Dempsey•Ethics•2021

  • European political parties’ complicity in democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Fabio Wolkenstein•Global Constitutionalism•2021

  • When Targeted Sanctions Miss the Mark

    Open Access•Celia Challet, Ryan Yu-Lin Liou et al.•Human Rights Review•2025

  • Why states have no right to privacy, but may be entitled to secrecy

    Open Access•Dorota Mokrosińska•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • When Minds Converse

    Philip Pettit•When Minds Converse•2025

  • Rationality, Appearances, and Apparent Facts

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2018

  • Knowledge as a Non‐Normative Relation

    Open Access•Kurt Sylvan•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Principles of Proportionate Punishment

    Open Access•Mitchell N Berman•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2022

  • Responsibility and the Special Question ‘Why?’

    Open Access•John Hyman, Maximilian Kiener•Philosophy•2026

  • Monstrous bodily excess in The Exorcist as a supplement to law's accounts of culpability

    Penny Crofts•Griffith Law Review•2015

  • Corporate moral insolvency

    Open Access•Meredith Edelman•Griffith Law Review•2024

  • Corrective justice, coherence, and Kantian right

    Andrew Fell•University of Toronto Law Journal•2019

  • On the generality argument for the knowledge norm

    Open Access•Davide Fassio•Synthese•2020

  • An Epistemic Nonconsequentialism

    Kurt Sylvan, Kurt L Sylvan•The Philosophical Review•2020

  • Justification, Conformity, and the Norm of Belief

    Open Access•Davide Fassio•Dialogue•2020

  • Collective Responsibility for Unjust Wars

    Open Access•Endre Begby•Politics•2012

  • Epistemic Reasons I

    Open Access•Kurt Sylvan•Philosophy Compass•2016

  • On (Not) Accepting the Punishment for Civil Disobedience

    Open Access•Piero Moraro•The Philosophical Quarterly•2018

Unique citing works29
Citations per year1,61
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 28

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae