The Nature of Desert Claims
Rethinking What it Means to Get One's Due
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23800433 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kevin Kinghorn (0000-0002-9935-7493, Asbury Theological Seminary, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Nature of Desert Claims (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781108955546 |
| OpenAlex | W3159261269 |
| ISBN | 9781108955546 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 39 |
Our everyday conversations reveal the widespread assumption that positive and negative treatment of others can be justified on the grounds that 'they deserve it'. But what is it exactly to deserve something? In this book, Kevin Kinghorn explores how we came to have this concept and offers an explanation of why people feel so strongly that redress is needed when outcomes are undeserved. Kinghorn probes for that core concern which is common to the range of everyday desert claims people make, ultimately proposing an alternative model of desert which represents a fundamental challenge to the received wisdom on the structure of desert claims. In the end, he argues, our plea for deserved treatment ends up being linked to the universal human concern for a shared narrative, as we seek healthy relationships within a community.
Ambivalence · Desert (philosophy) · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Narrative · Plea · Political science · Redress · Sociology · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Belief in a Just World
Moral Character in Person Perception
Fair and square
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
On the Matter of Suffering
Justice as Fittingness
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes, and Liberalism in Philosophy and Politics
Boundaries and Allegiances
Desert and entitlement
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
The Elements of Justice
Equality and Priority
Why not be a desertist?
Against the Asymmetry of Desert
Desert, Virtue, and Justice
Reasons and the Good
What We Owe to Each Other
Reasons and Persons
Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test
Justice and the Human Good
Two Distinctions in Goodness
Is Desert in the Details? 1
Adjusting Utility for Justice
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation
Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods
Justice, Desert, and the Repugnant Conclusion
British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing
The Geometry of Desert
Weighing Goods
Principles of Social Justice
Crowding Out Culture
How to Deserve
Negating Positive Desert Claims
Humanity before Justice
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment
Unethical and inept? The influence of moral information on perceptions of competence
The Concept of Desert in Distributive Justice
When Bad (Good) Things Happen to Good (Bad) People
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |