Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Zum Einfluss des Historikers auf die Historie am Fallbeispiel Amenhoteps II.

Bibliographic Data

ID23815958
AuthorsLutz Popko (corresponding author)
Year2011
Pages649-665
Publication date2011-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueMethodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherBrill | Fink (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.30965/9783846751855_037
OpenAlexW3135397587
ISBN9783846751855
LanguageDE

Historians are not objective. They don’t simply reconstruct history: they construct it. The historians’ subjectivity already becomes perceptible at the starting point of the historical interpretation, namely when questions concerning their sources are posed by them. Although this is not a new realization, many older interpretations of the „political history“, which is regarded as antiquated, are not analyzed critically, but are taken as historical facts. A good example for this is Amenhotep II. With the focus always put on the same sources, he is characterised repeatedly as an exaggerating, cruel and barbarous king. His military campaigns seem to pale in comparison to the wars of his victorious father, Thutmose III. But in a broader context, some of Amenhoteps so-called barbarous acts appear to be comprehensible.

Archaeology · Construct (python library) · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Humanities · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Subjectivity · Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Ancient Near East History · Computer Science · History · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae