Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Dan Zahavi
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Oxford School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography
ANO Não informado
TIPO Artigo
DOI 10.1177/1049732318817547
CITAÇÕES 12
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18

Resumo

Max van Manen and Jonathan Smith have recently had an exchange in Qualitative Health Research concerning their respective use of phenomenology. I welcome the attempt to get clearer on what phenomenology amounts to and I agree with van Manen that an overly arbitrary use of the term will lead to an erosion of the reputation of phenomenology. However, I think both of them are to blame for promoting various confusions concerning the nature of phenomenology. The aim of my article is to make some critical remarks concerning van Manen's and Smith's understanding of phenomenology and to suggest alternative resources for qualitative researchers interested in phenomenology.

Ferramentas