Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) G. Ampah Johnson , Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Australian National University, Dept. of Gender, Media and Cultural Studies, University College London
ANO Não informado
TIPO Artigo
DOI 10.1177/1049732320921835
CITAÇÕES 16
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18

Resumo

Qualitative researchers are under increasing time demands to rapidly collect, analyze, and disseminate the results of their findings. Adaptations to qualitative methods may be required to enable the use of timely and relevant qualitative data across multiple disciplinary settings. The aim of this review is to briefly explore the ways in which data collection and analysis methods have been adapted in qualitative research to deal with short study timeframes. We carried out a two-phased systematic review of the literature and determined there were six primary reasons why rapid techniques were used: (a) reduce time, (b) reduce cost, (c) increase the amount of collected data, (d) improve efficiency, (e) improve accuracy, and (f) obtain a closer approximation to the narrated realities of research participants. In addition, we analyzed the characteristics of the articles, how traditional methods were adapted and evaluated, the benefits and limitations of using rapid techniques, and future recommendations.

Ferramentas