Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) J. Mitchell , A. Green , M. Williams , L. Persson , Penelope Hawe , Victoria Loblay , Andrew Milat , Kathleen P. Conte , Sisse Grøn , Christine Innes-Hughes
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Centre for Population Health, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, New South Wales Office of Preventive Health, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Health Promotion Service, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia, Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, The University of Sydney
ANO Não informado
TIPO Artigo
DOI 10.1177/1049732320962438
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18

Resumo

Co-production partnerships between policymakers, practitioners, and researchers are designed to facilitate production of relevant and readily usable research in health policy and practice contexts. We describe methodological strategies for in-depth collaborative analysis based on a co-produced ethnography of health promotion practice, involving ethnographic researchers and government-based research partners. We draw on a co-production dialogue to reflect critically on the role and value of co-analyzing research findings using thick ethnographic descriptions. The ambiguity of ethnographic imagery allowed flexibility in interpretation of findings and also generated friction. Specific ethnographic images became focal points for productive friction that crystallized ethical and analytical imperatives underpinning the diverse expertise in the team. To make the most of co-analysis of thick ethnographic descriptions, we assert that friction points must be reflexively considered as key learning opportunities for (a) higher order analysis informed by diverse analytical perspectives and (b) more cohesive and useful interpretations of research findings.

Ferramentas