Is an Emphasis on Dignity, Honor and Face more an Attribute of Individuals or of Cultural Groups?
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Australian Catholic University, Renmin University, China, University of Baghdad, Iraq, Hokkaido University, Japan, International Islamic University Malaysia, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Georgia, University of Windsor, ON, Canada, University of Sussex, Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey, Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico, Thammassat University, Thailand, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Iowa State University, Tilburg University, University of Brasilia, ,, King Saud University, The University of Hong Kong, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile, Clemson University, SC, USA, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia, Ruhr University, Germany, Groningen University, Netherlands, University of Athens, Greece, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation, Lawrence Technological University, MI, USA, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Argentina, Yerevan State University, Armenia, Kazan Federal University, Russia, Mackenzie University, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Private practice, Gioia Tauro, Italy, Diego Portales University, Chile |
| ANO | Não informado |
| TIPO | Artigo |
| DOI | 10.1177/1069397120979571 |
| CITAÇÕES | 2 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
Resumo
This study compares the individual-level and sample-level predictive utility of a measure of the cultural logics of dignity, honor, and face. University students in 29 samples from 24 nations used a simple measure to rate their perceptions of the interpersonal cultural logic characterizing their local culture. The nomological net of these measures was then explored. Key dependent measures included three different facets of independent versus interdependent self-construal, relevant attitudes and values, reported handling of actual interpersonal conflicts, and responses to normative settings. Multilevel analyses revealed both individual- and sample-level effects but the dignity measure showed more individual-level effects, whereas sample-level effects were relatively more important with the face measure. The implications of this contrast are discussed.