Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) G.E. Marcus
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Rice University
ANO 2001
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Qualitative Inquiry
ISSN 1077-8004
E-ISSN 1552-7565
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/107780040100700408
CITAÇÕES 20
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 e543df911bb3e8889bc8ff9c338853b2

Resumo

This article offers a sketch of the past uses of the concept of rapport in anthropological discussions of its core identifying method of fieldwork. The trope of collaboration, emphasized in the 1980s critiques of ethnographic authority, failed to displace the rhetorical power of rapport in defining the ethos of fieldwork. Only the changing conditions of many contemporary fieldwork projects have dislodged the naturalness and symbolic strength of the concept in anthropology's professional culture, but without offering any alternative. Instead, the complicities of fieldwork relations emerge in the shadow of rapport 'under erasure' as a focus for reimagining the elements of the classic, regulative ideals of fieldwork.

Ferramentas