Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Bent Flyvbjerg
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Aalborg University
ANO 2006
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Qualitative Inquiry
ISSN 1077-8004
E-ISSN 1552-7565
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/1077800405284363
CITAÇÕES 189
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 e4c9f79150aee1562e478e4ce3b76104

Resumo

This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

Ferramentas