A Citizen's Claim
Science With and for Society
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2386669 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marta Soler-Gallart (0000-0003-4494-4508), Marta Soler (Universitat de Barcelona), Aitor Gómez (0000-0001-8994-9885, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 8-9 |
| Pages | 943-947 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1077-8004 • E-ISSN: 1552-7565 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1077800420938104 |
| OpenAlex | W3043103997 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 17 |
Social science research has been attacked by neoliberal thinkers who allege that such research lacks economic objectives. In the face of neoliberal and positivist criteria for evaluating the social impact of social science inquiry, social science researchers are developing qualitative evaluation methodologies through which we can have direct contact with citizens. These qualitative methodologies declare our social responsibility as social researchers in addressing relevant problems, especially those affecting the most vulnerable people. From these qualitative methodologies, the most vulnerable groups are included in the assessment of the social impacts of social research. Some examples of people who have participated in this qualitative evaluation include women, youth, immigrants, and Roma organizations. Participants perceived social science researchers as being far from their social reality, but in this research, they began to overcome their skepticism that social science research can help to solve those problems affecting their everyday lives
Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Pedagogy · Political science · Positivism · Public relations · Qualitative research · Science education · Skepticism · Social research · Social science · Social science education · Sociology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Impacting life expectancies of incarcerated people through dialogic scientific gatherings and dialogic scientific workshops in prisons
Citizen Social Science for Improved Quality of Life
Violence Against LGBTIQ+ People at Universities
Health Impacts of Isolating Gender Violence
Dialogic Scientific Gatherings
Dialogic Literary Gatherings
Citizen Debates in Social Networks about Didactic Resources for Mathematics
My friends are like my family’
Who promoted the nightlife of flirts? Freedom or capitalist bussiness
Citizen social science and pathways to prosperity
Consent? At the Start, You Do Not Even Think About It. Coercive Discourse in the Awakening of Affective–Sexual Relationships in Young Women
The time of dialogic sociology
Building a More Inclusive Workplace for Religious Minorities
Mapping Team Dynamics Through Retrospective Team Events Analysis
Researchers' Perceptions About Methodological Innovations in Research Oriented to Social Impact
Social Impact Indicators in the Context of the Roma Community
Dialogic Reconstruction of Memory
A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research
Citizen values assessment
Effectiveness in social impact assessment
Participative social impact assessment and management cross-cultural application
Resistance to and Transformations of Gender-Based Violence in Spanish Universities
Perceptions of impacts, public participation, and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India
A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment
The importance of cultural aspects in impact assessment and project development
Qualitative Science Policy
Evaluation, research and demonstration in the social sciences
Benefits of 'observer effects
Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics
Toward a global sociology of knowledge
On sources and narratives in historical social science
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |