Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) A. Toomela
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Tartu, Estonia
ANO 2003
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Culture & Psychology
ISSN 1354-067X
E-ISSN 1461-7056
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/1354067x03009001003
CITAÇÕES 6
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 b5a7d07ac39de2f9b8e52166c2fdc9a6

Resumo

What should be studied in order to understand culture depends on how culture is defined. Different definitions imply different methods and research questions. Sneddon (2003) suggests that, to understand culture, it is necessary to study cultural activities, tacit and explicit representations. I propose that Sneddon's account is incomplete; there are more than only two kinds of representations that should be differentiated. In addition, there is no way to study representations without studying activities. Thus, it is necessary to understand what kinds of representations can be studied through different activities. I also draw attention to communication, which is not just another cultural activity, but rather a very special social-cultural activity through which limits of sensory-based information processing can be transcended.

Ferramentas