Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Imposter Participants

A Call for Social Science Intervention

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2392482
AutoresAzeem Merchant (University of Edinburgh), Azeem Aziz Merchant (The University of Edinburgh, UK), Sophie Atherton (0000-0001-8332-4139, The University of Edinburgh, UK), Jaime García-Iglesias (0000-0002-8841-5635, The University of Edinburgh, UK, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Volume31
Fascículo1
Páginas138-148
Data de publicação2025-07-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSociological Research Online (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1360-7804 • E-ISSN: 1360-7804
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13607804251340013
OpenAlexW4411951520
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas25

The rise of 'imposter participants' in research - individuals who misrepresent their identities or experiences to gain access to studies 1 - has become a contentious issue, particularly as online research methods have expanded since the COVID-19 pandemic. While existing literature suggests indicators and strategies for identifying such participants, current approaches may risk excluding marginalized groups. This article reframes the discussion, arguing that the current focus on detection and exclusion requires broader epistemological debate. We propose that, rather than focusing on better screening tools, social sciences should use imposter participants to reflect on authenticity in research and authority in knowledge production. These reflections are a crucial first step in addressing broader questions of inclusion, exclusion, and research integrity. Rather than offering solutions, this article seeks to provoke a conversation about the evolving challenges of participant verification in an increasingly digital and diverse research landscape

Epistemology · Sociology · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research

    Open Access•Mehrunisha Suleman, Mayuri Gogoi et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2026

  • Re‐Thinking the Imposter Participant

    Open Access•Sophie Cranston, Sarah Mill et al.•Area•2026

  • Mitigating the risk of imposter participants in qualitative research

    Open Access•Margaret Husted, Debra Gray et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2026

  • Rethinking the Role of HIV/Aids Memories in Gay Men's Experiences of Covid‐19 Fear

    Open Access•Sophie Atherton, Jaime García-Iglesias et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2026

  • Language Barriers to Health Care in the United States

    Glenn Flores•New England Journal of Medicine•2006

  • Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Catherine Pope, Nick Mays•BMJ•1995

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • ‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity

    Open Access•Damien Ridge, Laurna Bullock et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Ask Me No Secrets, I'll Tell You No Lies

    Open Access•Sarah Flicker•Qualitative Report•2015

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • The Voter ID Debate

    Open Access•Ana Alonso-Curbelo•Parliamentary Affairs•2023

  • Digital inequalities and why they matter

    Laura Robinson, Shelia R Cotten et al.•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide

    Open Access•Neil Selwyn•New Media & Society•2004

  • Reflexive convention

    Open Access•B Heaphy•British Journal of Sociology•2018

  • Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation

    Open Access•John Lawlor, Carl Thomas et al.•Methodological Innovations•2021

  • Beyond the challenge to research integrity

    K Drysdale, Nathanael Wells et al.•Health Sociology Review•2023

  • Who can you trust these days

    Open Access•A Santinele Martino, Arielle Perrotta et al.•Qualitative Research•2024

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano4
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae