Imposter Participants
A Call for Social Science Intervention
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2392482 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Azeem Merchant (University of Edinburgh), Azeem Aziz Merchant (The University of Edinburgh, UK), Sophie Atherton (0000-0001-8332-4139, The University of Edinburgh, UK), Jaime García-Iglesias (0000-0002-8841-5635, The University of Edinburgh, UK, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 138-148 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociological Research Online (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1360-7804 • E-ISSN: 1360-7804 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13607804251340013 |
| OpenAlex | W4411951520 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
The rise of 'imposter participants' in research - individuals who misrepresent their identities or experiences to gain access to studies 1 - has become a contentious issue, particularly as online research methods have expanded since the COVID-19 pandemic. While existing literature suggests indicators and strategies for identifying such participants, current approaches may risk excluding marginalized groups. This article reframes the discussion, arguing that the current focus on detection and exclusion requires broader epistemological debate. We propose that, rather than focusing on better screening tools, social sciences should use imposter participants to reflect on authenticity in research and authority in knowledge production. These reflections are a crucial first step in addressing broader questions of inclusion, exclusion, and research integrity. Rather than offering solutions, this article seeks to provoke a conversation about the evolving challenges of participant verification in an increasingly digital and diverse research landscape
Epistemology · Sociology · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Language Barriers to Health Care in the United States
Qualitative Research
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity
Ask Me No Secrets, I'll Tell You No Lies
Naturalistic inquiry
The Voter ID Debate
Digital inequalities and why they matter
Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide
Reflexive convention
Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation
Beyond the challenge to research integrity
Who can you trust these days
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |