On the use of definitions in sociology
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations |
ANO | 2020 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | European Journal of Social Theory |
ISSN | 1368-4310 |
E-ISSN | 1461-7137 |
EDITORA | Sage Publications Ltd |
DOI | 10.1177/1368431019831855 |
CITAÇÕES | 3 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
8ca7ebbe9ac71657b9c2a2c44294f959
|
Resumo
Definitions may seem marginal to the sociological enterprise but can be very useful; however, they can also lead to serious errors. Examples of both are given in this article. Different types of definitions are presented, and their relevance for sociology is highlighted. A stipulative definition, for example, is very useful in sociology, as opposed to lexical and ostensive definitions. The definition of a concept that is used in a sociological analysis has to be sociological in nature, and the concept cannot have the same meaning as it has in everyday language. Additional items to bear in mind when a definition is put together are discussed, including some tips on how to proceed that come from political science (Sartori, Collier, Goertz). A definition can also be very helpful in the research process itself by indicating which are the important aspects of some phenomenon to focus on (Weber, Blumer). On the negative side, a term that is not properly defined may lead to misunderstandings as well as to a false sense of agreement with other uses of the term.