The Cairns abortion trial: Language, deviance, and the 'spoiled identity'
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Queensland University of Technology, Australia |
| ANO | 2015 |
| TIPO | Article |
| PERIÓDICO | Journal of Sociology |
| ISSN | 1440-7833 |
| E-ISSN | 1741-2978 |
| EDITORA | SAGE Publications |
| DOI | 10.1177/1440783314536794 |
| CITAÇÕES | 2 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
| MD5 |
eb3ec38dae5b266fc3299b40bfd0e2fc
|
| FORMATO |
Resumo
In 2009 a couple in Cairns were charged, and later found not guilty, of illegally obtaining a medical abortion through the use of medication imported from overseas. The court case reignited the discussions surrounding the illegality and social acceptance of abortion in Queensland, Australia. Based on a discourse analysis of 150 online news media articles covering the Cairns trial, this article critically examines the language and key words relied upon by media when covering the Cairns trial. It argues that, despite popular support for the decriminalisation of abortion, emotive language that aligns with a pro-life ideology is still being employed which has the power to shape perceptions of deviance and stigma surrounding abortion. This is useful to demonstrate how media discourse surrounding abortion needs to further align with a pro-choice ideology for women to be empowered for their choices.