Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of California, Los Angeles, USA, [email protected] |
ANO | 2010 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Anthropological Theory |
ISSN | 1463-4996 |
E-ISSN | 1741-2641 |
EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/1463499610370517 |
CITAÇÕES | 45 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
1c67b18c508c9b96bcf6151a28965f55
|
Resumo
In this article, the notion of intersubjectivity is re-examined by going back to its original formulation by the philosopher Edmund Husserl at the beginning of the 20th century. On the basis of a careful reading of Husserl's books and lecture notes, four claims are put forward that help clarify in what sense intersubjectivity is a broader and more fundamental notion than currently assumed in the social sciences. In particular, it is argued that for Husserl intersubjectivity is more than shared or mutual understanding and is closer to the notion of the possibility of being in the place where the Other is. Furthermore, intersubjectivity is the source of objectivity and not always or necessarily something to be achieved or negotiated through verbal communication or other means. In fact, in its most basic sense, Husserlian intersubjectivity includes a mode of participation in the natural and material world that does not even require an immediately perceivable human presence. Following this discussion, it is suggested that the full range of meanings of intersubjectivity found in Husserl's writings can be used as the basis for a study of the human condition that has a chance to unite all subfields of anthropology as practiced in the US. With this goal in mind, six related but distinct domains of intersubjectivity are proposed.