Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Selling surveillance

The discursive legitimation of AI control in Japanese convenience stores

Dados Bibliográficos

ID24019151
AutoresGwen Bouvier (0000-0003-1855-4258, Shanghai International Studies University), Yong Jiang (0000-0001-6192-8206, Shanghai International Studies University, autor correspondente), Jiang Yong (0000-0001-8495-4474, Shanghai International Studies University, P.R. China)
Ano2026
Data de publicação2026-08-04
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoDiscourse & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0957-9265 • E-ISSN: 1460-3624
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09579265261463722
OpenAlexW7172484820
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas37

AI-driven surveillance technologies are marketed to Japanese convenience stores as solutions to rising crime. This article analyses the marketing materials of one technology company, Vaak, to examine how its system VaakEye is discursively constructed and how it legitimizes AI surveillance. The study is situated within a broader policy context in which the Japanese state promotes AI adoption through initiatives such as Society 5.0, while offering limited regulatory scrutiny. The analysis finds that AI is framed as an autonomous, ‘objective’, and common-sense solution, while customers and staff are represented as unreliable and suspicious, and therefore in need of technological oversight and behavioural managing. These representations draw on and reproduce ideologies of technological solutionism and safety and convenience, while obscuring the social and structural causes of crime. In so doing, they naturalize surveillance as necessary and desirable, and shift authority from human judgement to opaque algorithmic systems. This normalizes the expansion of data-driven monitoring in everyday life, contributing to a redistribution of power toward corporate actors and the infrastructures of surveillance capitalism. By framing these developments as inevitable and beneficial, opportunities for critical debate are foreclosed. This allows systems of behavioural control to become embedded in routine, everyday social practices like shopping.

Context (archaeology) · Control (management) · Critical discourse analysis · Framing (construction) · Ideology · Legitimacy · Legitimation · Situated · Social control · Social media · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

  • Japan — A Modern Retail Superpower

    Open Access•Roy Larke, Michael Causton•Japan - a Modern Retail Superpower•2005

  • Too Smart

    Jathan Sadowski•Too Smart•2020

  • The Digital Sublime

    Vincent Mosco•The Digital Sublime•2004

  • How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis

    D Machin, Andrea Mayr•How to Do Critical Discourse…•2023

  • Introduction to Multimodal Analysis

    Per Ledin, D Machin•Introduction to Multimodal Analysis•2020

  • Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems

    Open Access•Andrew D Selbst, Drick Boyd et al.•Proceedings of the Conference on…•2019

  • Big Data's Disparate Impact

    Open Access•Solon Barocas, Andrew D Selbst•SSRN Electronic Journal•2016

  • The Computer for the 21st Century

    Mark Weiser•Scientific American•1991

  • Policing the Crisis

    Open Access•Stuart Hall, Chas Critcher et al.•Policing the Crisis•1978

  • Excavating AI

    Open Access•K Crawford, Trevor Paglen•AI & Society•2021

  • Part-Time Crime

    Open Access•Jason Ditton, J R Ditton•Part-Time Crime•1977

  • Dreamscapes of Modernity

    Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Dreamscapes of Modernity•2015

  • Subverting the prison

    Open Access•Carol Lawson•International Journal of Law in…•2021

  • Corporate crime and the discursive deletion of responsibility

    Open Access•D Machin, Andrea Mayr•Crime Media Culture An…•2012

  • Depends on Who’s Got the Data’

    Open Access•D Lupton, Mike Michael•Surveillance & Society•2017

  • Datafication, dataism and dataveillance

    Open Access•José Van Dijck•Surveillance & Society•2014

  • Scrounger-bashing” as national pastime

    Open Access•James Morrison•Social Semiotics•2021

  • Artificial intelligence and visual discourse

    Open Access•Emma Putland, Chris Chikodzore-Paterson et al.•Social Semiotics•2023

  • Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies

    Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Science as Culture•2013

  • The generic uniqueness of AI imagery

    Open Access•Gustav Westberg, Gunhild Kvåle•Discourse & Society•2024

  • Algorithmic state surveillance

    Open Access•Eleni Kosta•Regulation & Governance•2022

  • Legitimizing Immigration Control

    Open Access•T Van Leeuwen, R Wodak•Discourse Studies•1999

  • What is multimodal critical discourse studies

    D Machin•Critical Discourse Studies•2013

  • On the Governance of Artificial Intelligence through Ethics Guidelines

    Open Access•Sofia Larsson, Stefan Larsson•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2020

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae