Selling surveillance
The discursive legitimation of AI control in Japanese convenience stores
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 24019151 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gwen Bouvier (0000-0003-1855-4258, Shanghai International Studies University), Yong Jiang (0000-0001-6192-8206, Shanghai International Studies University, autor correspondente), Jiang Yong (0000-0001-8495-4474, Shanghai International Studies University, P.R. China) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-08-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Discourse & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0957-9265 • E-ISSN: 1460-3624 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09579265261463722 |
| OpenAlex | W7172484820 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
AI-driven surveillance technologies are marketed to Japanese convenience stores as solutions to rising crime. This article analyses the marketing materials of one technology company, Vaak, to examine how its system VaakEye is discursively constructed and how it legitimizes AI surveillance. The study is situated within a broader policy context in which the Japanese state promotes AI adoption through initiatives such as Society 5.0, while offering limited regulatory scrutiny. The analysis finds that AI is framed as an autonomous, ‘objective’, and common-sense solution, while customers and staff are represented as unreliable and suspicious, and therefore in need of technological oversight and behavioural managing. These representations draw on and reproduce ideologies of technological solutionism and safety and convenience, while obscuring the social and structural causes of crime. In so doing, they naturalize surveillance as necessary and desirable, and shift authority from human judgement to opaque algorithmic systems. This normalizes the expansion of data-driven monitoring in everyday life, contributing to a redistribution of power toward corporate actors and the infrastructures of surveillance capitalism. By framing these developments as inevitable and beneficial, opportunities for critical debate are foreclosed. This allows systems of behavioural control to become embedded in routine, everyday social practices like shopping.
Context (archaeology) · Control (management) · Critical discourse analysis · Framing (construction) · Ideology · Legitimacy · Legitimation · Situated · Social control · Social media · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Japan — A Modern Retail Superpower
Too Smart
The Digital Sublime
How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis
Introduction to Multimodal Analysis
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Big Data's Disparate Impact
The Computer for the 21st Century
Policing the Crisis
Excavating AI
Part-Time Crime
Dreamscapes of Modernity
Subverting the prison
Corporate crime and the discursive deletion of responsibility
Depends on Who’s Got the Data’
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance
Scrounger-bashing” as national pastime
Artificial intelligence and visual discourse
Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies
The generic uniqueness of AI imagery
Algorithmic state surveillance
Legitimizing Immigration Control
What is multimodal critical discourse studies
On the Governance of Artificial Intelligence through Ethics Guidelines
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |