Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Water grabbing and the Vizhinjam sea port

Care, ownership, resistance and the way forward

Bibliographic Data

ID24019346
AuthorsAmal LATIF (0009-0005-2723-8398, SRM University, Andhra Pradesh, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-16
Publication date2026-08-06
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Ethnography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2046-6749 • E-ISSN: 2046-6757
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/joe-11-2025-0159
OpenAlexW7172513287
LanguageEN
References cited13

Purpose The study explores the socio-economic and environmental implications of the development of the Vizhinjam Seaport International Limited in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, particularly focussing on the marginalised Mukkuva (fishermen) community, who are largely dependent on the coastal ecosystem for their livelihood. Drawing on ethnographic research, it argues that the conflict is fundamentally a struggle over ownership, care and rights to the sea. While the blue economy frames coastal waters as spaces of investment and infrastructural development, the Mukkuva community understands the sea as a commons sustained through intergenerational labour, care and belonging. The study explores how port-led development produces dispossession and ecological uncertainty, while the Church, as a civil society institution, enabled collective resistance and recognition. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Vizhinjam, Kerala. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, informal conversations, participant observation and field visits among fishers, clergy, activists and community leaders. Particular attention was paid to local understandings of the sea, experiences of displacement, ecological change and resistance to the port project. Ethnographic findings were complemented by analysis of policy documents, Environmental Impact Assessment reports, media reports and legal records. The study offers a qualitative account of how coastal communities negotiate competing claims over marine resources and development. Findings Drawing on ethnographic research among the Mukkuva community, this study shows how port-led development transforms the sea from a lived commons into strategic infrastructure serving national and corporate interests, further raising the question of whether investments in finance or nurture grant rights to control the sea. At its heart lies a contest over ownership, legitimacy and the authority to define the future of coastal environments. The restrictions on fishing, the erosion of customary access and the increasing regulation of marine spaces reveal how dispossession operates not only through the loss of land but also through the gradual loss of collective ownership within the community. It was in this context that the Church emerged as a significant civil society institution, translating ecological loss, collective ownership and exclusion into politically visible claims. Yet its role was neither straightforward nor uniformly oppositional. Rather, the Church occupied a complex position between resistance, negotiation and its existence, illustrating how civil society organisations mediate struggles over large-scale development projects embedded within the very political structures they seek to influence. Originality/value The study contributes to debates on the blue economy by shifting attention from economic growth to questions of ownership, care and marine commons. Bringing together scholarship on accumulation by dispossession, commons governance, civil society and recognition, it demonstrates how conflicts over coastal development are simultaneously struggles over who has the authority to define, govern and care for the sea. Empirically, the study provides original ethnographic insights into the Vizhinjam conflict and highlights the role of the Church as a civil society institution that validates grassroots claims. The findings advance discussions on fisher rights, environmental justice and democratic coastal governance.

Civil society · Commons · Corporate governance · Ethnography · Government (linguistics) · Investment (military) · Negotiation · Participant observation · Resistance (ecology) · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Social and Economic Development in India · Water Governance and Infrastructure

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • Retelling Tales of the Field

    Open Access•Ann L Cunliffe•Organizational Research Methods•2010

  • Securing a Just Space for Small-Scale Fisheries in the Blue Economy

    Open Access•Philippa J Cohen, Edward H Allison et al.•Frontiers in Marine Science•2019

  • The New Imperialism

    David Harvey, David C Harvey•The new imperialism•2003

  • Putting coastal communities at the center of a sustainable blue economy

    Open Access•Louisa Evans, Louisa S Evans et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2023

  • Blind spots in visions of a “blue economy” could undermine the ocean's contribution to eliminating hunger and malnutrition

    Open Access•Anna K Farmery, Edward H Allison et al.•One Earth•2021

  • The Management of Confidentiality and Anonymity in Social Research

    Rose Wiles, Graham Crow et al.•International Journal of Social…•2008

  • Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis

    Open Access•T A Van Dijk•Discourse & Society•1993

  • Rethinking Recognition

    Nancy Fraser•New left review•2000

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae